On September 18, 2025, the Mississippi Supreme Court issued its opinion in In re Estate of Herbert Bernard Ivison, Jr. (No. 2024-CA-00421-SCT), affirming the Scott County Chancery Court’s decision to deny Malouf & Malouf, PLLC’s attempt to recover past-due compound interest on unpaid legal fees.[1] The ruling in the instant case provides helpful guidance on…
Read More
“Asset protection is a legitimate, legally sanctioned objective; though one that has limitations of its own.” The timing of asset protection planning can be critical when it comes to these “limitations.” By the time a creditor is reasonably foreseeable, the creditor may be able to stop or unwind transfers of assets whether through obtaining an…
Read More
In 2014, Mississippi enacted the Mississippi Qualified Disposition in Trust Act,[1] which amended the former provisions of the Mississippi Trust Code to allow the creation of a “qualified disposition trust,” also known as a domestic asset protection trust (“DAPT”). Generally, assets placed in trust by someone other than a beneficiary are protected from such beneficiary’s…
Read More
In asset protection planning, sometimes things go as planned. Other times, they go horribly wrong. The United States Supreme Court just issued its opinion in Yegiazaryan v. Smagin[1] which illustrates one situation where the debtor finds himself facing the potential treble damages due to alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).…
Read More
What are the rights of a creditor to LLC interests to satisfy their claim? That question was at issue in a recent opinion from the Alabama Supreme Court.[1] In that case, the creditor received a “charging order” (discussed below) requiring that distributions from the LLC made to the debtor be instead transferred to the clerk…
Read More