Gage – Cashier Check Timing Case

Cases, Income Tax, Tax, Tax Controversy, Tax Court

We have covered timing and delivery issues in several articles, such as the recent Demuth and Hoensheid cases.[1] Similarly, the recent Tax Court case of Gage v. Comm’r dealt with the taxpayers that believed they paid a $875,000 settlement to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) in December of 2012.[2] Unfortunately for the…
Read More

Injunctive Relief Hiding in Plain Sight? CIC Services, LLC v. IRS

Cases, District Court, Income Tax, Tax Controversy

So, we did not write on the first District Court case which was a loss for CIC Services, LLC (“CIC”) and Ryan, LLC(“Ryan”), the Plaintiffs. But, a Supreme Court decision gave the Plaintiffs another bite at the apple. This case involves Notice 2016-66 (“Notice”), the older-sibling notice to Notice 2017-10, in which micro-captive insurance transactions…
Read More

IRS Demands iTunes Cards? Beware the Dirty Dozen!

Charitable Giving, Compliance, Current Events, Income Tax, Tax, Tax Controversy

In January of 2002 the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued a press release highlighting a dozen different tax scams and encouraged taxpayers to “maintain national vigilance.”[1] This list was dubbed the “Dirty Dozen,” and the IRS has continued to issue similar press releases containing updated lists of purported tax scams for taxpayers to be on…
Read More

Blossom Day Care Centers – The Income Tax Side

Income Tax, Tax Court

Last week, Charles Allen wrote about Blossom Day Care Centers, Inc. (“Blossom”) and its owners regarding their employment tax case.[1] Frequently, we write articles intending to remind readers of the importance of substantiation, especially in the income tax world. In reviewing Charles Allen’s article, I kept finding myself wondering about the income tax implications of…
Read More

Corporation Liable for Employment Tax on Reasonable Compensation of Corporate Officers

Employment Tax, Income Tax, Tax Controversy, Tax Court

In a recent Tax Court case, the Court determined that corporate officers were indeed employees of the corporation entitled to reasonable compensation, and as such, the corporation is liable for employment taxes on reasonable compensation imputed to the corporate officers.[1] Mr. and Mrs. Hacker, who owned 51% and 49% of Blossom Day Care Centers (“Blossom”)…
Read More

Directions